I don't support that. That's why I don't wan't to wear makeup that has been tested on animals.
Also, what ingredients can I look out for, that uses animals?
ex. gelatin, in altoids, has hoofs in it. so it there any ingredients in commonly used products that is harmful to animals?What cosmetic products are animal testing free?
I recommend caringconsumer.com
This is a good decision, no matter what everyone else's opinion are. Since everyone has different morals.
Why should animals suffer so that we can get fuller lashes?What cosmetic products are animal testing free?
anything from the body shop
bare minerals by bare escentuals, 100% pure minerals, no animal testing. for a complete list check out www.peta.com.
http://www.peta2.com/STUFF/s-cf1.asp
smashbox
http://caringconsumer.com/pdfs/companies鈥?/a>
here's a link.
i asked a question like yours and everyone was being rude.
i hope my answer helps you
there aren't as much comanies that test on animals anymore from what i can tell
Bonne Bell and Smackers don't test their beauty products on animals.
Animal testing and the use of animal ingredients are two completely different issues. Some companies that claim to be ';cruelty-free'; use glycerin, lanolin, honey which are animal based ingredients.
When you review a list of ';cruelty-free'; companies at websites like PETA, Caring consumer and All for animals, look out for brands that have been marked very specifically as VEGAN. These are brands/products that are against animal testing and
do not contain animal based ingredients.
On their website Urban Decay (http://www.urbandecay.com) has specified which products are suitable for vegans. Lush and Kiss My Face do the same.
Off the top of my head, I know Wet n Wild and Got 2 B don't. And wet n wild is cheap, too. But check out Peta's website, they have a complete list including a pocket sized book you can print out.
Mary Kay doesn't test on animals.
So you want to wear makeup that has been tested on people? It has to be tested on something/ someone. I believe in animal rights, but human rights are more important. The poor would be enticed by the financial incentives offered by human testing. Do you really want to take advantage of the impoverished?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment